As a final sad note on the U.S. Senate vote this week on Canadian drug reimportation, here’s an analysis by David Sirota:
These people still haven’t answered the very simple question Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) asked in 2005: “Why allow bad beef to enter the U.S. from Canada and not allow safe medicine?”
The answer, of course, is simple: Because in 2006, agribusiness gave lawmakers $44 million in campaign contributions to pose as a “free” traders when doing so supports their efforts to destroy domestic family farming, and the drug industry kicked in another $19 million to get the same lawmakers to be the corporate protectionists they really are, whether they are voting to ban importation or to create price-inflating patent protections in our trade policies.
We ordinary citizens — the John Q. Publics — have to stand up and fight this! Let me check my pockets:
A quarter.
Some lint.
A button that fell off my shirt earlier.
A safety pin.
Oh, well. Maybe next year…








3 responses so far ↓
1 eDrugSearch Blog » Blog Archive » ABC News details dangers of unscrupulous online pharmacies // May 21, 2007 at 6:09 am
[...] Why? Because our Congress and the FDA –having been bought and paid for by Big Pharma – would rather you live in fear of online pharmacies than to provide you with a safe system for using them. [...]
2 eDrugSearch Blog » Blog Archive » Why the FDA allows unsafe drugs on the market // May 24, 2007 at 2:43 pm
[...] The simple answer to Marilynn’s question is this: FOLLOW THE MONEY. [...]
3 Five tips for choosing an online pharmacy | eDrugSearch Blog // Mar 10, 2008 at 10:10 am
[...] is partly our own government’s fault. Until the FDA stops wasting its enforcement efforts on licensed, legitimate Canadian pharmacies and starts focusing on the real problem of rogue pharmacies, consumers must be careful in selecting [...]
Leave a Comment