<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDA can&#8217;t keep up with Big Pharma advertising claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrugsearch.com/edsblog/fda-cant-keep-up-with-big-pharma-advertising-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrugsearch.com/edsblog/fda-cant-keep-up-with-big-pharma-advertising-claims/</link>
	<description>Helping Americans Buy Prescription Drugs Online from Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eDrugSearch Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When it comes to drug ads, is the FDA the new MPAA?</title>
		<link>http://www.edrugsearch.com/edsblog/fda-cant-keep-up-with-big-pharma-advertising-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-32142</link>
		<dc:creator>eDrugSearch Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When it comes to drug ads, is the FDA the new MPAA?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edrugsearch.com/edsblog/fda-cant-keep-up-with-big-pharma-advertising-claims/#comment-32142</guid>
		<description>[...] The FDA positions the plan as a toughening of previously lax regulations in response to public complaints about direct-to-consumer ads. The reality is, the projected $6 million in annual fees for FDA review would primarily serve to keep the drug ads coming at a blistering pace. As one observer sums up FDA priorities: [FDA officials] behave as if their job is to get as many &#8220;good products&#8221; to the American public as quickly as they can. The focus should be on public safety rather than on facilitation of the drug availability process. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The FDA positions the plan as a toughening of previously lax regulations in response to public complaints about direct-to-consumer ads. The reality is, the projected $6 million in annual fees for FDA review would primarily serve to keep the drug ads coming at a blistering pace. As one observer sums up FDA priorities: [FDA officials] behave as if their job is to get as many &#8220;good products&#8221; to the American public as quickly as they can. The focus should be on public safety rather than on facilitation of the drug availability process. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

